Prediction of Lilian Marmousez [380th] vs Hazem Naow [574th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W L W W L W W W
Form
W L W W L W L W L LHead To Head: Marmousez 2 - 0 Naow
They have played 4 sets in total, with Marmousez winning 4 and Naow winning 0. The last match between Marmousez and Naow was at the M15 Alkmaar, 21-06-2022, First, Clay with Lilian Marmousez getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Lilian Marmousez | 2 |
Hazem Naow | 0 |
Marmousez | Stats | Naow |
---|---|---|
67% (10-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
380 | Ranking | 574 |
380 | Highest Rank | 299 |
23 | Age | 25 |
- | Plays | - |
3 | Titles | 4 |
61% (140-91) | Career Total W/L | 64% (170-97) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Hazem Naow
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
6-1 6-1 |
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 0 |
24 | Games Won | 5 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
0:34:30 | Average Match Time | 0:34:30 |
55% (24/44) | 1st Serve % | 62% (31/50) |
88% (21/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (19/31) |
45% (9/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 21% (4/19) |
45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
54% (27/50) | Return Points Win % | 32% (14/44) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lilian Marmousez vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Marmousez 2 - 0 Naow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marmousez has won 42.44% of points on their second serve, while Naow has won 44.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marmousez, in recent form, has won 43.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 41.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.02% and 30.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marmousez has saved 51.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 65.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marmousez has won 75% of matches played (W/L 51/ 17), with Naow winning 50% (W/L 19/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marmousez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 83/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 11/ 15). Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 75/ 32), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 60/ 44).
- Player level: In the last year, Marmousez has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.44% of matches (W/L 43/ 14), where as Naow has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Marmousez winning 2 times and Naow being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Marmousez winning 4 and Naow winning 0. The last match between Marmousez and Naow was at the M15 Alkmaar, 21-06-2022, First, Clay with Lilian Marmousez getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:34:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marmousez and Naow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marmousez winning 0 times and Naow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marmousez winning 0, and Naow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marmousez has played against opponents with an average rank of 379.37 while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 375.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marmousez has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marmousez has converted 26.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 13.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Lilian Marmousez Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Pierluigi Basile
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Andrea Picchione
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Andrej Martin
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Filippo Romano
Player
Lilian Marmousez
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Andrea Motta
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Giannicola Misasi
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Marko Topo
Player
Lilian Marmousez
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve %
40%
(
8 of
20)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
43%
(
3 of
7)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
16
Total Points Won
17
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Philip Henning
Player
Lilian Marmousez
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Hazem Naow
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Hazem Naow
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hazem Naow
Player
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
80 of
124)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
50 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
118
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hazem Naow
Player
Matisse Bobichon
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Hazem Naow
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hazem Naow
Player
Mika Brunold
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Hazem Naow
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Yaroslav Demin
Player
Hazem Naow
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Hazem Naow
Player
Luis Garcia Paez
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Marmousez vs Naow?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Marmousez Vs Naow is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (140/91) | Win/Loss | 64% (170/97) |
61% (310/199) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (374/233) |
54% (2526/2112) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3061/2561) |
0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
676 | Aces Total | 385 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
491 | Total Double Faults | 690 |
1:30:54 | Average Match Time | 1:22:11 |
429.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 400.32 |
59% (7883/13368) | 1st Serve % | 67% (9776/14507) |
68% (5392/7883) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6326/9776) |
52% (2839/5485) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2255/4731) |
44% (683/1554) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (801/1757) |
42% (5831/13822) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6478/14781) |
64% (138/217) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (166/262) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
62% (33/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (32/60) |
49% (28/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (38/74) |
85% (144/122) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (165/148) |
14% (144/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (165/17) |
21% (85/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (102/22) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...